赌侠

F1 investigates Chinese boy group's concert logo over alleged trademark infringement_我的网站

一 |     김민석, 이진숙 겨냥 “여자 전두환으로 불러드리자”김재섭 “野 의원 제명발상, 전두환과 무엇이 다른가”국회 본회의서 與주도 이진숙 제명 촉구결의안 통과                   연합뉴스 자료사진김재섭(사진) 국민의힘 의원은 26일 자당의 이진숙 의원을 ‘여자 전두환’이라고 지칭한 김민석 더불어민주당 대표를 향해 “정청래(전 대표)처럼 강성 팬덤에 기대 폭주한들, 보급형 정청래가 될 뿐”이라고 주장했다.당내 비주류로 분류되는 초선 김 의원은 이날 자신의 페이스북에 “이 의원을 두고 여자 전두환을 외치다가 스스로 입법 전두환이 된 김민석에게 묻는다”며 이같이 적었다.김 의원은 “야당 의원을 다수의석으로 제명하겠다는 발상, 1980년 전두환이 ‘정치풍토쇄신법’으로 800명을 숙청하던 수법과 무엇이 다른가”라고 강조했다.그러면서 “역사적·정치적 평가가 끝난 5·18 민주화운동에 대해 음모론을 제기하는 일체의 의견에 반대한다”며 “그러나 5·18을 핑계로 전두환식 정적 제거를 벤치마킹하는 민주당 당대표도 한심하긴 마찬가지”라고 덧붙였다.김 의원의 이 같은 발언은 앞서 김민석 민주당 대표가 이날 민주당 최고위원회의에서 이 의원을 ‘여자 전두환’으로 지칭한 데 대한 맞대응 차원으로 풀이된다.김 대표는 최근 ‘5.18 폄훼’ 논란을 일으킨 이 의원에 대해 “이 의원에 대한 말씀을 여러 분이 주셨는데, 공통적인 지적이 나왔다. (이 의원이) 여자 히틀러 호칭에 대해서는 시비를 걸고 여자 전두환에 대해서는 안 거냐는 말씀을 해주셨다”며 “‘여자 전두환’이라는 호칭은 좋아하시나 보다”라고 했다.이어 그는 “그래서 앞으로 우리 당에서는 이 의원이 상당히 선호한다고 보여지는 이름으로 ‘여자 전두환’으로 통일해 불러드리는 것이 어떨까라는 생각이 들었다“고 말했다.한편, 이날 국회에서는 본회의를 통해 민주당 주도로 이 의원에 대한 제명 촉구 결의안이 통과됐다. 표결에는 159명이 참여해 찬성 157표, 반대 1표, 기권 1표로 가결됐다. 이는 인사 안건이라 무기명 투표 방식으로 진행됐다. 민주당이 발의한 결의안 표결에는 조국혁신당과 진보당 등 범여권이 참여했다.이날 결의안 강행 처리에 반발한 국민의힘 의원 대부분은 안건이 상정된 직후 본회의장을 떠났다. 다만 친한(친한동훈)계 등 일부 의원은 표결에 참여하기도 했다.。    

    A screenshot circulating on Chinese social media compares the Formula One (F1) logo (left) with the logo used for the Teens in Times concert tour
Formula 1 (F1) has referred information about the logo used for a concert tour by Chinese boy group Teens in Times (TNT) to the appropriate team for review and investigation, after motorsport fans said that the design closely resembles F1's trademark, multiple Chinese media outlets reported.
According to Beijing Youth Entertainment, F1 said in a formal response that "the information provided had been referred to the appropriate team and was currently under review and investigation."
Time Fengjun, a Beijing-based talent agency that manages popular idol groups including TNT, has meanwhile blurred the logo in its official concert videos, according to a report by Beijing Youth Entertainment.
Time Fengjun designed the promotional logo for TNT's racing-themed concert in May. Some motorsport fans said that the logo's red, three-part slanted design with a concave curve in the middle closely resembles the outline of F1's current trademark, which was introduced in 2017, with the original "F1" lettering replaced by "TNT."
The concert's stage screens, official footage and merchandise also feature elements resembling F1's visual style, which were used in ticket sales, performances and other commercial promotions, according to reports. No authorization from F1 has been reported.
Motorsport fans had reportedly raised concerns with Times Fengjun through official communication channels as early as July, but the company did not initially take action, Beijing Youth Entertainment reported.
Li Yunkai, an intellectual property lawyer at Beijing-based Beijing Tianyuan Law Firm, cautioned that F1's response does not mean that trademark infringement has been established already.
From a Trademark Law perspective, it would be premature to conclude that TNT has infringed F1's trademark based solely on the two images circulating online. More accurately, if the logo was indeed used without authorization from F1 and was used as a source-identifying mark in connection with the concert and its commercial promotion, there could be a relatively high risk of trademark infringement, he said.
F1's rights holder has registered relevant figurative trademarks in China, including No. 76729750 in Class 41, covering entertainment and performance-related services, according to Li. The case would be assessed based on factors including the similarity of the marks and services and the likelihood of consumer confusion, in line with China's trademark infringement standards.
The two logos are not identical but share similarities in their overall shape, slant, lines and visual style. The concert's broader racing-themed imagery could also be relevant in assessing whether consumers might believe there was an affiliation, sponsorship or authorization by F1, said the lawyer.
If the concert also used F1-associated elements such as "RACETRACK," racing and track imagery, or checkered flags, those elements could be relevant to assessing the likelihood of consumer confusion and the intent behind the use. Courts would consider the broader context in which the logo was used, rather than comparing the two logos as isolated graphic designs, including whether consumers might believe the concert had an authorization, partnership or sponsorship relationship with F1.
"A final determination would depend on the specific F1 trademark at issue, the scope of services covered by the registration, how the logo was actually used and the evidence presented by both sides," Li told the Global Times.
    Photo: Screenshot from website
。

Current article:http://www.bainangmieruopanglaomen.sbs/news/20260826_95255.htm

Published on:02:51:32